FAQs
Why is the District of Sechelt updating short-term rental (STR) regulation now?
The District of Sechelt has been regulating short-term rentals since 2005, using Zoning Bylaw, Business Licence and Enforcement Bylaws. A lot has changed with vacation rentals since 2005, especially in the past five years with the rapid expansion of online platforms. A review of regulations is needed to address current realities and Sechelt’s community needs.
Does a STR Secondary Residence licence mean that the rental is located in a commercially zoned area in Sechelt or can it be located in a residential neighbourhood?
The proposed STR regulations only apply to tourist guest accommodations in residential neighbourhoods. This does not apply to tourist commercial accommodations (hotels, motels, resorts) in areas with commercial zoning.
What is a short-term rental accommodation?
Short-term rentals are rentals of a residential dwelling (either the entire dwelling or rooms within it), for under 30 days. The rental is listed on online advertising platforms such as Airbnb, VRBO, Booking.com, Expedia and others. STRs are also commonly referred to as vacation rentals.
What is the difference between a short-term rental accommodation and Bed & Breakfast (B&B)?
B&B’s typically have an on-site resident or operator, who is present during guest stays. The rental unit is either a guest room or a suite located within the principal residence. B&B’s have the oversight of operators who are responsible for the conduct of guests.
When will I have an opportunity to comment on proposed STR regulations?
The District of Sechelt is consulting with community members and stakeholders on proposed regulations from February to April 2022. Public consultation includes online workshops and an online survey to gather community members' input and perspectives.
Who is the District of Sechelt consulting with on proposed regulations?
The District of Sechelt wants to receive input from those most affected by possible regulations including accommodation operators, neighbours of these businesses, tourism & business associations, residents associations and Sechelt residents.
Will I be able to see the consultation feedback? How will input be used?
In April 2022, the District of Sechelt’s consultant will prepare a “What We Heard” report, that will summarize consultation feedback received during the February/ March 2022 consultation. This report will be posted here on the Your Say Sechelt page.
Feedback will be used to support Council in making a decision regarding STR regulations.
Would there be ‘grandfathering’ for businesses that have been operating with a Town business licence?
No, once new District of Sechelt bylaws come into effect in future (i.e., zoning, business licences, and enforcement), all businesses would be required to follow the requirements of those new bylaws and operate within the terms and conditions of the new business licence.
The proposed regulatory approach would include a phase-in period to allow for a smooth transition. The new regulations would take effect one year from bylaws adoption date, or as close as possible to the beginning of a new calendar year. This one-year period would allow for STR operators, and visitors to adjust plans. Many short-term rentals are on a repeat booking basis and it’s not unrealistic that renters book a vacation period a year in advance (especially for peak season July-August).
What is the rationale for the proposed business licence fees?
A core principle for the District of Sechelt is to have business licence fees cover the cost of administering the STR program. Program costs include, setting up a new system, effectively communicating the regulations, setting up an online application system (more user-friendly), staff time to review applications, staff time to check for compliance (i.e., legal suites), paying third party compliance monitoring software and services, covering bylaw and enforcement staff costs, among others.
Proposed fees are based on the level of demand associated with the business type. The highest fees are for commercial operators (unhosted), as these are known to be most resource intensive of staff time and have the highest potential for neighbour complaints.
Type of Licence | Unit Type | Fee |
Accessory | Within primary residents' home | $250/year |
Suites | Within primary residents' property | $750/year |
Commercial | Secondary home/ no onsite resident | $3000/year |
Why do I hear that there are 249 STR’s in Sechelt from the consultant, but AirDNA states less than 200 STRs in the District of Sechelt?
According to Granicus, a leading STR monitoring company, in September 2021, there were 249 active unique rental listings in the District of Sechelt. AirDNA only monitors 2 platforms - Airbnb and Homeway (Expedia), and only on a quarterly basis. Granicus monitors the major 67 platforms (removing duplicate listings) and for the period of time when the request is made. The moment in time that STR data is captured is important. The number of listings will keep changing by the week, by the month, by the season, by the year, as hosts change their listing and availability for a wide variety of reasons. Granicus will always capture more listings because it is gathering data from more platforms and specific to the time of request.
Will Sechelt's regulations align with the Sunshine Coast Regional District and the Town of Gibsons (or create more confusion)?
We recognize that the District of Sechelt is part of the Sunshine Coast tourism region, so we have also been speaking with our municipal and Regional District neighbours to discuss opportunities and options that may allow for better regulatory coordination across municipal boundaries.
In 2019, the SCRD implemented STR regulations using Temporary Use Permits in 2019. Regional districts have fewer regulatory tools available to them compared to municipalities, so the regulations in rural areas will likely differ from those in municipalities (Sechelt, Gibsons).
The Town of Gibsons is also in the process of developing regulations for managing STRs. The priority objective for STR regulations for Gibsons Council is to “retain long term rental supply in Gibsons” (Committee of the Whole, September 29, 2021). This priority objective for Gibsons may result in trying different STR management tools.
Reasons for Regulations
What is ‘Business and Regulatory Equity’?
Tourist commercial businesses have explained that they want a level playing field for businesses that have higher commercial operating costs (staffing, regulations, taxes). They may want to update their commercial tourist accommodations to meet current market demands, however residential STRs are a source of competition for tourist accommodation dollars.
What are proposed regulations intending to accomplish? What is the objective?
In recent years, District of Sechelt Council and staff have heard from community members and STR operators that there is a need for regulations to protect the character of residential neighbourhoods, protect limited housing supply and promote regulatory equity for tourist commercial accommodation providers, who have higher operating requirements and costs. Direction on balancing these priorities was identified by Council members in December 2021. The information presented to the public at this time is intended to guide the drafting of STR regulations. (February 25, 2022)
Impacts
As dwelling units are converted to STRs the supply of housing available to residents shrinks, driving prices up.
The ability to earn STR revenue – which can often exceed revenue from renting out a unit long-term – leads some tenants and purchasers to bid up the price of housing. These two harms are felt most acutely in communities already facing a housing shortage and/or affordability pressures, and where a locally-significant number of units have been converted to STR.
There is no way to study impacts of STR regulations in a community, without testing them and monitoring effects. It is recommended that the effects of STR regulations be monitored, reported to Council and adjusted, to ensure they are having the intended outcomes.
What impact will proposed regulations have on housing affordability? Shouldn’t there be more impact studies first?
Isn’t it better to have more tourist accommodations options?
STRs are recognized as providing important additional accommodation options in the District of Sechelt. However, STRs are not the only form of accommodation available. In addition to STRs, Sechelt has commercial tourist accommodations including 4 hotels / motels operating 89 rooms combined, 6 recreational vehicle/ mobile home parks and 3 campgrounds.
STRs compete directly with commercial tourist accommodations, and under the current regulations carry much lower operating costs. The District of Sechelt has heard from tourism businesses that they would like a level playing field for businesses with higher operating costs. Some cite that they wish to update their accommodations to meet current market demands, but are unable to as residential STRs are a source of competition for tourist spending and have an unfair advantage of lower operating costs.
Has consideration been made regarding the impact of STR on the infrastructure challenges in the District of Sechelt? (water)
The assessment of servicing capacity is addressed at the time of new development reviews.
What will be the impact of proposed regulations on tourism in Sechelt?
In 2021, travelers spent $8M on accommodation and $15.2M on restaurants, activities, shopping, etc. The District of Sechelt recognizes that tourism is vital to our local economy and employment.
The proposed regulations reflect a desire to balance community needs with the need to maintain adequate tourism accommodations. The proposed regulations would allow for an unlimited number of STR’s in principal residences and in separate suites on owner/resident properties (STR Accessory and STR Suites) throughout the District. In cases where the STR is not the owners’ principal home or property of primary residence, there is the STR Commercial category, with a maximum of 30 licenses proposed.
Limits: Residency
If neighbourhood fit is the number one priority why would Type 2 Self-Contained Suites or Type 3 - Secondary Residences licenses be permitted in the R1 zone?
District of Sechelt bylaw enforcement and planning staff have explained that STR neighbour complaints (ie noise, party houses, backyard fires, street parking issues) have been limited to unsupervised STR’s, where there is no full-time owner or resident on-site. In December 2020, the District of Sechelt heard from residents, stakeholders and community groups that most support STRs that have an owner resident during guest stays. Both the Type 1 and Type 2 STR categories require a full-time owner /resident. The proposed cap of 15 Type 3 Secondary Residence licences is intended to limit the number of STRs with an off-site owner or manager.
What if we live close by and meet with every guest upon check-in/check-out, will that be sufficient for Type 3 - Secondary Residence?
Type 3 - Secondary Residence applies to the rental of a home or apartment on a property where the owner does not primarily reside. This applies to vacation homes and investment properties. It allows for rental of any home or unit type, with local contact person(s) available for offsite management. The manager of the Type 3 STR must be reachable 24/7 and be able to respond quickly (within 30 minutes), should issues arise. The District of Sechelt also proposes to post the names and contact of STR managers on their website to better facilitate direct communications.
Why put a cap of 15 on Type 3 - Secondary Residence category, where the home/ property is a secondary residence?
In the District of Sechelt, challenges with short-term rentals and neighbourhood fit have been identified most frequently, particularly in the absence of a resident/owner during guest stays or local contact person, who can quickly address nuisance issues. In addition, non-resident STRs are contributing to a lack of housing availability in Sechelt, as homes are being purchased for the purpose of commercial short-term rental use, which is increasing prices and reducing availability for long-term housing.
Limits: Unit Type
Can Tiny Homes be STRs?
A tiny home on wheels does not qualify as a dwelling. If it qualifies as an RV of sorts then it could potentially be used for short term accommodation. The minimum zoning requirements for building: “No building containing a dwelling unit shall have a width less than six (6.0) metres, of which at least seven point three (7.3) metres (twenty-four (24.0) feet) or forty (40%) percent of the building length (whichever is greater) is enclosed climate-controlled habitable living area.”
Limits: Frequency of Use
Do the proposed bylaws prevent a person from owning and operating multiple STRs within the District?
The proposed District of Sechelt STR regulations (dated February/ March 2022), are designed to allow homeowners to rent out one STR unit type as a guest accommodation on their property of full-time residence (any type of unit can be an STR - there are no restrictions on unit type). If a person owns additional properties, this would fit into the STR Commercial category. There is a proposed limit of 30 commercial STR business licences for the entire District of Sechelt. The current proposal is to limit a maximum of one STR commercial licence per property owner or company
Should total number of short-term rentals be limited (capped by neighbourhoods or throughout community) to address the rental housing problem?
We hear that residents are concerned about the shortage of rental housing and perceived competition from short-term vacation rentals. The Sunshine Coast Regional District and the District of Sechelt collaborated on a Housing Needs Report in November 2020. This study estimated that in the District of Sechelt short-term rental units represent approximately 4% of private housing stock, or an estimated 194 units in the community (854 units or rooms on the entire Sunshine Coast).
While the District of Sechelt recognizes that the rental market is under increasing pressures with regards to both vacancy rates and cost of rent, we believe that supporting a variety of options for housing and tourist accommodations is in everybody’s best interest.
Will there be a limit on the number of days for the Short-term rental Accessory license category?
There are no limits on the numbers of days proposed for any STR category. The intent with STR Accessory licence category is to allow full-time residents (owner or authorised resident) to rent their homes when they are away on vacation. The STR Accessory and STR Suites category will require proof of residency (or owners authorization).
What if there is an STR Commercial that is not rented at least 90 nights in a calendar year, does it require a licence?
There is no proposed limit on the number of rental days in a calendar year for any STR category, including Type 3 (as currently proposed, they can be rented 365 days a year). The draft regulations do state that for STR commercial this “applies to STRs that are available for rent at least half of the year (183) nights and are actually rented at least 90 nights in a calendar year”.
Will there be a regulation regarding proximity of the 15 Type 3 - Secondary Residence licenses to prevent multiple operations in proximity to our house?
Currently, there is no proposed maximum number of STRs proposed per block or per neighbourhood. The proposed cap of 15 Type 3 licences is for all of the District of Sechelt.
Maximum Guests & Rooms
Will the District consider restricting the size of the group rather than the presence of on-site operator?
The District of Sechelt has limited staffing to monitor STR operations. Counting the numbers of people in a group, at any given time, is difficult to enforce. For this reason, restricting the size of STR guests/ groups is not proposed as a requirement.
Is there a maximum number of guests for STR Accessory and STR Suites or is it bedrooms?
Currently, there is no restriction on the number of guests (people) or bedrooms, in STR Accessory, STR Suites or STR Commercial category. There is a proposed requirement of 1 on-site parking stall per STR room, with a maximum of 3 parking spaces provided on the property. Parking is an achievable requirement for District staff to enforce.
Licence Fees
What is the rationale for the proposed business licence fees?
A core principle for the District of Sechelt is to have business licence fees cover the cost of administering the STR program. Program costs include, setting up a new system, effectively communicating the regulations, setting up an online application system (more user-friendly), staff time to review applications, staff time to check for compliance (i.e., legal suites), paying third party compliance monitoring software and services, covering bylaw and enforcement staff costs, among others.
Proposed fees are based on the level of demand associated with the business type. The highest fees are for commercial operators (unhosted), as these are known to be most resource intensive of staff time and have the highest potential for neighbour complaints.
Type of Licence | Unit Type | Licence Fee |
STR Accessory | Within primary residents’ home | $250/year |
STR Suite | Within primary residents’ property | $750/year |
STR Commercial | Secondary home/ no onsite resident | $3000/year |
Regulation Enforcement
How will new regulations be enforced?
It is recommended that the District of Sechelt use an STR monitoring company called Granicus to support proactive compliance monitoring, enforcement and ticketing fines. Failure to comply with business licence conditions are proposed to be subject to fines. It is recommended that fines increase to a grade of up to $500/ offence or day for non-compliance. Non-compliance would likely include failure to post the business licence number on online advertising platforms, negatively impacting neighbours use and enjoyment of property (ie. noise, fires, garbage), among others (consistent with future STR related bylaws).